NASM contains a powerful macro processor, which supports conditional assembly, multi-level file inclusion, two forms of macro (single-line and multi-line), and a `context stack' mechanism for extra macro power. Preprocessor directives all begin with a sign.
The preprocessor collapses all lines which end with a backslash (\) character into a single line. Thus:
%define THIS_VERY_LONG_MACRO_NAME_IS_DEFINED_TO \ THIS_VALUE
will work like a single-line macro without the backslash-newline sequence.
Single-line macros are defined using the preprocessor directive. The definitions work in a similar way to C; so you can do things like
%define ctrl 0x1F & %define param(a,b) ((a)+(a)*(b)) mov byte [param(2,ebx)], ctrl 'D'
which will expand to
mov byte [(2)+(2)*(ebx)], 0x1F & 'D'
When the expansion of a single-line macro contains tokens which invoke another macro, the expansion is performed at invocation time, not at definition time. Thus the code
%define a(x) 1+b(x) %define b(x) 2*x mov ax,a(8)
will evaluate in the expected way to , even though the macro wasn't defined at the time of definition of .
Macros defined with are case sensitive: after , only will expand to : or will not. By using instead of (the `i' stands for `insensitive') you can define all the case variants of a macro at once, so that would cause , , , and so on all to expand to .
There is a mechanism which detects when a macro call has occurred as a result of a previous expansion of the same macro, to guard against circular references and infinite loops. If this happens, the preprocessor will only expand the first occurrence of the macro. Hence, if you code
%define a(x) 1+a(x) mov ax,a(3)
the macro will expand once, becoming , and will then expand no further. This behaviour can be useful: see section 8.1 for an example of its use.
You can overload single-line macros: if you write
%define foo(x) 1+x %define foo(x,y) 1+x*y
the preprocessor will be able to handle both types of macro call, by counting the parameters you pass; so will become whereas will become . However, if you define
%define foo bar
then no other definition of will be accepted: a macro with no parameters prohibits the definition of the same name as a macro with parameters, and vice versa.
This doesn't prevent single-line macros being redefined: you can perfectly well define a macro with
%define foo bar
and then re-define it later in the same source file with
%define foo baz
Then everywhere the macro is invoked, it will be expanded according to the most recent definition. This is particularly useful when defining single-line macros with (see section 4.1.5).
You can pre-define single-line macros using the `-d' option on the NASM command line: see section 2.1.12.
To have a reference to an embedded single-line macro resolved at the time that it is embedded, as opposed to when the calling macro is expanded, you need a different mechanism to the one offered by . The solution is to use , or it's case-insensitive counterpart .
Suppose you have the following code:
%define isTrue 1 %define isFalse isTrue %define isTrue 0 val1: db isFalse %define isTrue 1 val2: db isFalse
In this case, is equal to 0, and is equal to 1. This is because, when a single-line macro is defined using , it is expanded only when it is called. As expands to , the expansion will be the current value of . The first time it is called that is 0, and the second time it is 1.
If you wanted to expand to the value assigned to the embedded macro at the time that was defined, you need to change the above code to use .
%xdefine isTrue 1 %xdefine isFalse isTrue %xdefine isTrue 0 val1: db isFalse %xdefine isTrue 1 val2: db isFalse
Now, each time that is called, it expands to 1, as that is what the embedded macro expanded to at the time that was defined.
Individual tokens in single line macros can be concatenated, to produce longer tokens for later processing. This can be useful if there are several similar macros that perform similar functions.
As an example, consider the following:
%define BDASTART 400h ; Start of BIOS data area
struc tBIOSDA ; its structure .COM1addr RESW 1 .COM2addr RESW 1 ; ..and so on endstruc
Now, if we need to access the elements of tBIOSDA in different places, we can end up with:
mov ax,BDASTART + tBIOSDA.COM1addr mov bx,BDASTART + tBIOSDA.COM2addr
This will become pretty ugly (and tedious) if used in many places, and can be reduced in size significantly by using the following macro:
; Macro to access BIOS variables by their names (from tBDA):
%define BDA(x) BDASTART + tBIOSDA. %+ x
Now the above code can be written as:
mov ax,BDA(COM1addr) mov bx,BDA(COM2addr)
Using this feature, we can simplify references to a lot of macros (and, in turn, reduce typing errors).
Single-line macros can be removed with the command. For example, the following sequence:
%define foo bar %undef foo mov eax, foo
will expand to the instruction , since after the macro is no longer defined.
Macros that would otherwise be pre-defined can be undefined on the command-line using the `-u' option on the NASM command line: see section 2.1.13.
An alternative way to define single-line macros is by means of the command (and its case-insensitive counterpart , which differs from in exactly the same way that differs from ).
is used to define single-line macros which take no parameters and have a numeric value. This value can be specified in the form of an expression, and it will be evaluated once, when the directive is processed.
Like , macros defined using can be re-defined later, so you can do things like
%assign i i+1
to increment the numeric value of a macro.
is useful for controlling the termination of preprocessor loops: see section 4.5 for an example of this. Another use for is given in section 7.4 and section 8.1.
The expression passed to is a critical expression (see section 3.8), and must also evaluate to a pure number (rather than a relocatable reference such as a code or data address, or anything involving a register).
It's often useful to be able to handle strings in macros. NASM supports two simple string handling macro operators from which more complex operations can be constructed.
The macro is like macro in that it creates (or redefines) a numeric value to a macro. The difference is that with , the numeric value is the length of a string. An example of the use of this would be:
%strlen charcnt 'my string'
In this example, would receive the value 8, just as if an had been used. In this example, was a literal string but it could also have been a single-line macro that expands to a string, as in the following example:
%define sometext 'my string' %strlen charcnt sometext
As in the first case, this would result in being assigned the value of 8.
Individual letters in strings can be extracted using . An example of its use is probably more useful than the description:
%substr mychar 'xyz' 1 ; equivalent to %define mychar 'x' %substr mychar 'xyz' 2 ; equivalent to %define mychar 'y' %substr mychar 'xyz' 3 ; equivalent to %define mychar 'z'
In this example, mychar gets the value of 'y'. As with (see section 4.2.1), the first parameter is the single-line macro to be created and the second is the string. The third parameter specifies which character is to be selected. Note that the first index is 1, not 0 and the last index is equal to the value that would assign given the same string. Index values out of range result in an empty string.
Multi-line macros are much more like the type of macro seen in MASM and TASM: a multi-line macro definition in NASM looks something like this.
%macro prologue 1 push ebp mov ebp,esp sub esp,%1 %endmacro
This defines a C-like function prologue as a macro: so you would invoke the macro with a call such as
myfunc: prologue 12
which would expand to the three lines of code
myfunc: push ebp mov ebp,esp sub esp,12
The number after the macro name in the line defines the number of parameters the macro expects to receive. The use of inside the macro definition refers to the first parameter to the macro call. With a macro taking more than one parameter, subsequent parameters would be referred to as , and so on.
Multi-line macros, like single-line macros, are case-sensitive, unless you define them using the alternative directive .
If you need to pass a comma as part of a parameter to a multi-line macro, you can do that by enclosing the entire parameter in braces. So you could code things like
%macro silly 2 %2: db %1 %endmacro silly 'a', letter_a ; letter_a: db 'a' silly 'ab', string_ab ; string_ab: db 'ab' silly , crlf ; crlf: db 13,10
As with single-line macros, multi-line macros can be overloaded by defining the same macro name several times with different numbers of parameters. This time, no exception is made for macros with no parameters at all. So you could define
%macro prologue 0 push ebp mov ebp,esp %endmacro
to define an alternative form of the function prologue which allocates no local stack space.
Sometimes, however, you might want to `overload' a machine instruction; for example, you might want to define
%macro push 2 push %1 push %2 %endmacro
so that you could code
push ebx ; this line is not a macro call push eax,ecx ; but this one is
Ordinarily, NASM will give a warning for the first of the above two lines, since is now defined to be a macro, and is being invoked with a number of parameters for which no definition has been given. The correct code will still be generated, but the assembler will give a warning. This warning can be disabled by the use of the command-line option (see section 2.1.18).
NASM allows you to define labels within a multi-line macro definition in such a way as to make them local to the macro call: so calling the same macro multiple times will use a different label each time. You do this by prefixing to the label name. So you can invent an instruction which executes a if the flag is set by doing this:
%macro retz 0 jnz %%skip ret %%skip: %endmacro
You can call this macro as many times as you want, and every time you call it NASM will make up a different `real' name to substitute for the label . The names NASM invents are of the form , where the number 2345 changes with every macro call. The prefix prevents macro-local labels from interfering with the local label mechanism, as described in section 3.9. You should avoid defining your own labels in this form (the prefix, then a number, then another period) in case they interfere with macro-local labels.
Occasionally it is useful to define a macro which lumps its entire command line into one parameter definition, possibly after extracting one or two smaller parameters from the front. An example might be a macro to write a text string to a file in MS-DOS, where you might want to be able to write
writefile [filehandle],"hello, world",13,10
NASM allows you to define the last parameter of a macro to be greedy, meaning that if you invoke the macro with more parameters than it expects, all the spare parameters get lumped into the last defined one along with the separating commas. So if you code:
%macro writefile 2+ jmp %%endstr %%str: db %2 %%endstr: mov dx,%%str mov cx,%%endstr-%%str mov bx,%1 mov ah,0x40 int 0x21 %endmacro
then the example call to above will work as expected: the text before the first comma, , is used as the first macro parameter and expanded when is referred to, and all the subsequent text is lumped into and placed after the .
The greedy nature of the macro is indicated to NASM by the use of the sign after the parameter count on the line.
If you define a greedy macro, you are effectively telling NASM how it should expand the macro given any number of parameters from the actual number specified up to infinity; in this case, for example, NASM now knows what to do when it sees a call to with 2, 3, 4 or more parameters. NASM will take this into account when overloading macros, and will not allow you to define another form of taking 4 parameters (for example).
Of course, the above macro could have been implemented as a non-greedy macro, in which case the call to it would have had to look like
writefile [filehandle],NASM provides both mechanisms for putting commas in macro parameters, and you choose which one you prefer for each macro definition.
See section 5.2.1 for a better way to write the above macro.
NASM also allows you to define a multi-line macro with a range of allowable parameter counts. If you do this, you can specify defaults for omitted parameters. So, for example:
%macro die 0-1 "Painful program death has occurred." writefile 2,%1 mov ax,0x4c01 int 0x21 %endmacro
This macro (which makes use of the macro defined in section 4.3.3) can be called with an explicit error message, which it will display on the error output stream before exiting, or it can be called with no parameters, in which case it will use the default error message supplied in the macro definition.
In general, you supply a minimum and maximum number of parameters for a macro of this type; the minimum number of parameters are then required in the macro call, and then you provide defaults for the optional ones. So if a macro definition began with the line
%macro foobar 1-3 eax,[ebx+2]
then it could be called with between one and three parameters, and would always be taken from the macro call. , if not specified by the macro call, would default to , and if not specified would default to .
You may omit parameter defaults from the macro definition, in which case the parameter default is taken to be blank. This can be useful for macros which can take a variable number of parameters, since the token (see section 4.3.5) allows you to determine how many parameters were really passed to the macro call.
This defaulting mechanism can be combined with the greedy-parameter mechanism; so the macro above could be made more powerful, and more useful, by changing the first line of the definition to
%macro die 0-1+ "Painful program death has occurred.",13,10
The maximum parameter count can be infinite, denoted by . In this case, of course, it is impossible to provide a full set of default parameters. Examples of this usage are shown in section 4.3.6.
For a macro which can take a variable number of parameters, the parameter reference will return a numeric constant giving the number of parameters passed to the macro. This can be used as an argument to (see section 4.5) in order to iterate through all the parameters of a macro. Examples are given in section 4.3.6.
Unix shell programmers will be familiar with the shell command, which allows the arguments passed to a shell script (referenced as , and so on) to be moved left by one place, so that the argument previously referenced as becomes available as , and the argument previously referenced as is no longer available at all.
NASM provides a similar mechanism, in the form of . As its name suggests, it differs from the Unix in that no parameters are lost: parameters rotated off the left end of the argument list reappear on the right, and vice versa.
is invoked with a single numeric argument (which may be an expression). The macro parameters are rotated to the left by that many places. If the argument to is negative, the macro parameters are rotated to the right.
So a pair of macros to save and restore a set of registers might work as follows:
%macro multipush 1-* %rep %0 push %1 %rotate 1 %endrep %endmacro
This macro invokes the instruction on each of its arguments in turn, from left to right. It begins by pushing its first argument, , then invokes to move all the arguments one place to the left, so that the original second argument is now available as . Repeating this procedure as many times as there were arguments (achieved by supplying as the argument to ) causes each argument in turn to be pushed.
Note also the use of as the maximum parameter count, indicating that there is no upper limit on the number of parameters you may supply to the macro.
It would be convenient, when using this macro, to have a equivalent, which didn't require the arguments to be given in reverse order. Ideally, you would write the macro call, then cut-and-paste the line to where the pop needed to be done, and change the name of the called macro to , and the macro would take care of popping the registers in the opposite order from the one in which they were pushed.
This can be done by the following definition:
%macro multipop 1-* %rep %0 %rotate -1 pop %1 %endrep %endmacro
This macro begins by rotating its arguments one place to the right, so that the original last argument appears as . This is then popped, and the arguments are rotated right again, so the second-to-last argument becomes . Thus the arguments are iterated through in reverse order.
NASM can concatenate macro parameters on to other text surrounding them. This allows you to declare a family of symbols, for example, in a macro definition. If, for example, you wanted to generate a table of key codes along with offsets into the table, you could code something like
%macro keytab_entry 2 keypos%1 equ $-keytab db %2 %endmacro keytab: keytab_entry F1,128+1 keytab_entry F2,128+2 keytab_entry Return,13
which would expand to
keytab: keyposF1 equ $-keytab db 128+1 keyposF2 equ $-keytab db 128+2 keyposReturn equ $-keytab db 13
You can just as easily concatenate text on to the other end of a macro parameter, by writing .
If you need to append a digit to a macro parameter, for example defining labels and when passed the parameter , you can't code because that would be taken as the eleventh macro parameter. Instead, you must code , which will separate the first (giving the number of the macro parameter) from the second (literal text to be concatenated to the parameter).
This concatenation can also be applied to other preprocessor in-line objects, such as macro-local labels (section 4.3.2) and context-local labels (section 4.7.2). In all cases, ambiguities in syntax can be resolved by enclosing everything after the sign and before the literal text in braces: so concatenates the text to the end of the real name of the macro-local label . (This is unnecessary, since the form NASM uses for the real names of macro-local labels means that the two usages and would both expand to the same thing anyway; nevertheless, the capability is there.)
NASM can give special treatment to a macro parameter which contains a condition code. For a start, you can refer to the macro parameter by means of the alternative syntax , which informs NASM that this macro parameter is supposed to contain a condition code, and will cause the preprocessor to report an error message if the macro is called with a parameter which is not a valid condition code.
Far more usefully, though, you can refer to the macro parameter by means of , which NASM will expand as the inverse condition code. So the macro defined in section 4.3.2 can be replaced by a general conditional-return macro like this:
%macro retc 1 j%-1 %%skip ret %%skip: %endmacro
This macro can now be invoked using calls like , which will cause the conditional-jump instruction in the macro expansion to come out as , or which will make the jump a .
The macro-parameter reference is quite happy to interpret the arguments and as valid condition codes; however, will report an error if passed either of these, because no inverse condition code exists.
When NASM is generating a listing file from your program, it will generally expand multi-line macros by means of writing the macro call and then listing each line of the expansion. This allows you to see which instructions in the macro expansion are generating what code; however, for some macros this clutters the listing up unnecessarily.
NASM therefore provides the qualifier, which you can include in a macro definition to inhibit the expansion of the macro in the listing file. The qualifier comes directly after the number of parameters, like this:
%macro foo 1.nolist
%macro bar 1-5+.nolist a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h
Similarly to the C preprocessor, NASM allows sections of a source file to be assembled only if certain conditions are met. The general syntax of this feature looks like this:
%if ; some code which only appears if is met %elif ; only appears if is not met but is %else ; this appears if neither nor was met %endif
The clause is optional, as is the clause. You can have more than one clause as well.
Beginning a conditional-assembly block with the line will assemble the subsequent code if, and only if, a single-line macro called is defined. If not, then the and blocks (if any) will be processed instead.
For example, when debugging a program, you might want to write code such as
; perform some function %ifdef DEBUG writefile 2,"Function performed successfully",13,10 %endif ; go and do something else
Then you could use the command-line option to create a version of the program which produced debugging messages, and remove the option to generate the final release version of the program.
You can test for a macro not being defined by using instead of . You can also test for macro definitions in blocks by using and .
The directive operates in the same way as the directive, except that it checks for the existence of a multi-line macro.
For example, you may be working with a large project and not have control over the macros in a library. You may want to create a macro with one name if it doesn't already exist, and another name if one with that name does exist.
The is considered true if defining a macro with the given name and number of arguments would cause a definitions conflict. For example:
%ifmacro MyMacro 1-3 %error "MyMacro 1-3" causes a conflict with an existing macro. %else %macro MyMacro 1-3 ; insert code to define the macro %endmacro %endif
This will create the macro "MyMacro 1-3" if no macro already exists which would conflict with it, and emits a warning if there would be a definition conflict.
You can test for the macro not existing by using the instead of . Additional tests can be performed in blocks by using and .
The conditional-assembly construct will cause the subsequent code to be assembled if and only if the top context on the preprocessor's context stack has the name . As with , the inverse and forms , and are also supported.
For more details of the context stack, see section 4.7. For a sample use of , see section 4.7.5.
The conditional-assembly construct will cause the subsequent code to be assembled if and only if the value of the numeric expression is non-zero. An example of the use of this feature is in deciding when to break out of a preprocessor loop: see section 4.5 for a detailed example.
The expression given to , and its counterpart , is a critical expression (see section 3.8).
extends the normal NASM expression syntax, by providing a set of relational operators which are not normally available in expressions. The operators , , , , and test equality, less-than, greater-than, less-or-equal, greater-or-equal and not-equal respectively. The C-like forms and are supported as alternative forms of and . In addition, low-priority logical operators , and are provided, supplying logical AND, logical XOR and logical OR. These work like the C logical operators (although C has no logical XOR), in that they always return either 0 or 1, and treat any non-zero input as 1 (so that , for example, returns 1 if exactly one of its inputs is zero, and 0 otherwise). The relational operators also return 1 for true and 0 for false.
The construct will cause the subsequent code to be assembled if and only if and , after expanding single-line macros, are identical pieces of text. Differences in white space are not counted.
is similar to , but is case-insensitive.
For example, the following macro pushes a register or number on the stack, and allows you to treat as a real register:
%macro pushparam 1 %ifidni %1,ip call %%label %%label: %else push %1 %endif %endmacro
Like most other constructs, has a counterpart , and negative forms and . Similarly, has counterparts , and .
Some macros will want to perform different tasks depending on whether they are passed a number, a string, or an identifier. For example, a string output macro might want to be able to cope with being passed either a string constant or a pointer to an existing string.
The conditional assembly construct , taking one parameter (which may be blank), assembles the subsequent code if and only if the first token in the parameter exists and is an identifier. works similarly, but tests for the token being a numeric constant; tests for it being a string.
For example, the macro defined in section 4.3.3 can be extended to take advantage of in the following fashion:
%macro writefile 2-3+ %ifstr %2 jmp %%endstr %if %0 = 3 %%str: db %2,%3 %else %%str: db %2 %endif %%endstr: mov dx,%%str mov cx,%%endstr-%%str %else mov dx,%2 mov cx,%3 %endif mov bx,%1 mov ah,0x40 int 0x21 %endmacro
Then the macro can cope with being called in either of the following two ways:
writefile [file], strpointer, length writefile [file], "hello", 13, 10
In the first, is used as the address of an already-declared string, and is used as its length; in the second, a string is given to the macro, which therefore declares it itself and works out the address and length for itself.
Note the use of inside the : this is to detect whether the macro was passed two arguments (so the string would be a single string constant, and would be adequate) or more (in which case, all but the first two would be lumped together into , and would be required).
The usual , and versions exist for each of , and .
The preprocessor directive will cause NASM to report an error if it occurs in assembled code. So if other users are going to try to assemble your source files, you can ensure that they define the right macros by means of code like this:
%ifdef SOME_MACRO ; do some setup %elifdef SOME_OTHER_MACRO ; do some different setup %else %error Neither SOME_MACRO nor SOME_OTHER_MACRO was defined. %endif
Then any user who fails to understand the way your code is supposed to be assembled will be quickly warned of their mistake, rather than having to wait until the program crashes on being run and then not knowing what went wrong.
NASM's prefix, though useful, cannot be used to invoke a multi-line macro multiple times, because it is processed by NASM after macros have already been expanded. Therefore NASM provides another form of loop, this time at the preprocessor level: .
The directives and ( takes a numeric argument, which can be an expression; takes no arguments) can be used to enclose a chunk of code, which is then replicated as many times as specified by the preprocessor:
%assign i 0 %rep 64 inc word [table+2*i] %assign i i+1 %endrep
This will generate a sequence of 64 instructions, incrementing every word of memory from to .
For more complex termination conditions, or to break out of a repeat loop part way along, you can use the directive to terminate the loop, like this:
fibonacci: %assign i 0 %assign j 1 %rep 100 %if j > 65535 %exitrep %endif dw j %assign k j+i %assign i j %assign j k %endrep fib_number equ ($-fibonacci)/2
This produces a list of all the Fibonacci numbers that will fit in 16 bits. Note that a maximum repeat count must still be given to . This is to prevent the possibility of NASM getting into an infinite loop in the preprocessor, which (on multitasking or multi-user systems) would typically cause all the system memory to be gradually used up and other applications to start crashing.
Using, once again, a very similar syntax to the C preprocessor, NASM's preprocessor lets you include other source files into your code. This is done by the use of the directive:
%include "macros.mac"
will include the contents of the file into the source file containing the directive.
Include files are searched for in the current directory (the directory you're in when you run NASM, as opposed to the location of the NASM executable or the location of the source file), plus any directories specified on the NASM command line using the option.
The standard C idiom for preventing a file being included more than once is just as applicable in NASM: if the file has the form
%ifndef MACROS_MAC %define MACROS_MAC ; now define some macros %endif
then including the file more than once will not cause errors, because the second time the file is included nothing will happen because the macro will already be defined.
You can force a file to be included even if there is no directive that explicitly includes it, by using the option on the NASM command line (see section 2.1.11).
Having labels that are local to a macro definition is sometimes not quite powerful enough: sometimes you want to be able to share labels between several macro calls. An example might be a . loop, in which the expansion of the macro would need to be able to refer to a label which the macro had defined. However, for such a macro you would also want to be able to nest these loops.
NASM provides this level of power by means of a context stack. The preprocessor maintains a stack of contexts, each of which is characterised by a name. You add a new context to the stack using the directive, and remove one using . You can define labels that are local to a particular context on the stack.
The directive is used to create a new context and place it on the top of the context stack. requires one argument, which is the name of the context. For example:
%push foobar
This pushes a new context called on the stack. You can have several contexts on the stack with the same name: they can still be distinguished.
The directive , requiring no arguments, removes the top context from the context stack and destroys it, along with any labels associated with it.
Just as the usage defines a label which is local to the particular macro call in which it is used, the usage is used to define a label which is local to the context on the top of the context stack. So the and example given above could be implemented by means of:
%macro repeat 0 %push repeat %$begin: %endmacro %macro until 1 j%-1 %$begin %pop %endmacro
and invoked by means of, for example,
mov cx,string repeat add cx,3 scasb until e
which would scan every fourth byte of a string in search of the byte in .
If you need to define, or access, labels local to the context below the top one on the stack, you can use , or for the context below that, and so on.
NASM also allows you to define single-line macros which are local to a particular context, in just the same way:
%define %$localmac 3
will define the single-line macro to be local to the top context on the stack. Of course, after a subsequent , it can then still be accessed by the name .
If you need to change the name of the top context on the stack (in order, for example, to have it respond differently to ), you can execute a followed by a ; but this will have the side effect of destroying all context-local labels and macros associated with the context that was just popped.
NASM provides the directive , which replaces a context with a different name, without touching the associated macros and labels. So you could replace the destructive code
%pop %push newname
with the non-destructive version .
This example makes use of almost all the context-stack features, including the conditional-assembly construct , to implement a block IF statement as a set of macros.
%macro if 1 %push if j%-1 %$ifnot %endmacro %macro else 0 %ifctx if %repl else jmp %$ifend %$ifnot: %else %error "expected `if' before `else'" %endif %endmacro %macro endif 0 %ifctx if %$ifnot: %pop %elifctx else %$ifend: %pop %else %error "expected `if' or `else' before `endif'" %endif %endmacro
This code is more robust than the and macros given in section 4.7.2, because it uses conditional assembly to check that the macros are issued in the right order (for example, not calling before ) and issues a if they're not.
In addition, the macro has to be able to cope with the two distinct cases of either directly following an , or following an . It achieves this, again, by using conditional assembly to do different things depending on whether the context on top of the stack is or .
The macro has to preserve the context on the stack, in order to have the referred to by the macro be the same as the one defined by the macro, but has to change the context's name so that will know there was an intervening . It does this by the use of .
A sample usage of these macros might look like:
cmp ax,bx if ae cmp bx,cx if ae mov ax,cx else mov ax,bx endif else cmp ax,cx if ae mov ax,cx endif endif
The block- macros handle nesting quite happily, by means of pushing another context, describing the inner , on top of the one describing the outer ; thus and always refer to the last unmatched or .
NASM defines a set of standard macros, which are already defined when it starts to process any source file. If you really need a program to be assembled with no pre-defined macros, you can use the directive to empty the preprocessor of everything but context-local preprocessor variables and single-line macros.
Most user-level assembler directives (see chapter 5) are implemented as macros which invoke primitive directives; these are described in chapter 5. The rest of the standard macro set is described here.
The single-line macros , , and expand to the major, minor, subminor and patch level parts of the version number of NASM being used. So, under NASM 0.98.32p1 for example, would be defined to be 0, would be defined as 98, would be defined to 32, and would be defined as 1.
The single-line macro expands to a dword integer representing the full version number of the version of nasm being used. The value is the equivalent to , , and concatenated to produce a single doubleword. Hence, for 0.98.32p1, the returned number would be equivalent to:
dd 0x00622001
db 1,32,98,0
Note that the above lines are generate exactly the same code, the second line is used just to give an indication of the order that the separate values will be present in memory.
The single-line macro expands to a string which defines the version number of nasm being used. So, under NASM 0.98.32 for example,
db __NASM_VER__
would expand to
db "0.98.32"
Like the C preprocessor, NASM allows the user to find out the file name and line number containing the current instruction. The macro expands to a string constant giving the name of the current input file (which may change through the course of assembly if directives are used), and expands to a numeric constant giving the current line number in the input file.
These macros could be used, for example, to communicate debugging information to a macro, since invoking inside a macro definition (either single-line or multi-line) will return the line number of the macro call, rather than definition. So to determine where in a piece of code a crash is occurring, for example, one could write a routine , which is passed a line number in and outputs something like `line 155: still here'. You could then write a macro
%macro notdeadyet 0 push eax mov eax,__LINE__ call stillhere pop eax %endmacro
and then pepper your code with calls to until you find the crash point.
The core of NASM contains no intrinsic means of defining data structures; instead, the preprocessor is sufficiently powerful that data structures can be implemented as a set of macros. The macros and are used to define a structure data type.
takes one parameter, which is the name of the data type. This name is defined as a symbol with the value zero, and also has the suffix appended to it and is then defined as an giving the size of the structure. Once has been issued, you are defining the structure, and should define fields using the family of pseudo-instructions, and then invoke to finish the definition.
For example, to define a structure called containing a longword, a word, a byte and a string of bytes, you might code
struc mytype mt_long: resd 1 mt_word: resw 1 mt_byte: resb 1 mt_str: resb 32 endstruc
The above code defines six symbols: as 0 (the offset from the beginning of a structure to the longword field), as 4, as 6, as 7, as 39, and itself as zero.
The reason why the structure type name is defined at zero is a side effect of allowing structures to work with the local label mechanism: if your structure members tend to have the same names in more than one structure, you can define the above structure like this:
struc mytype .long: resd 1 .word: resw 1 .byte: resb 1 .str: resb 32 endstruc
This defines the offsets to the structure fields as , , and .
NASM, since it has no intrinsic structure support, does not support any form of period notation to refer to the elements of a structure once you have one (except the above local-label notation), so code such as is not valid. is a constant just like any other constant, so the correct syntax is or .
Having defined a structure type, the next thing you typically want to do is to declare instances of that structure in your data segment. NASM provides an easy way to do this in the mechanism. To declare a structure of type in a program, you code something like this:
mystruc: istruc mytype at mt_long, dd 123456 at mt_word, dw 1024 at mt_byte, db 'x' at mt_str, db 'hello, world', 13, 10, 0 iend
The function of the macro is to make use of the prefix to advance the assembly position to the correct point for the specified structure field, and then to declare the specified data. Therefore the structure fields must be declared in the same order as they were specified in the structure definition.
If the data to go in a structure field requires more than one source line to specify, the remaining source lines can easily come after the line. For example:
at mt_str, db 123,134,145,156,167,178,189 db 190,100,0
Depending on personal taste, you can also omit the code part of the line completely, and start the structure field on the next line:
at mt_str db 'hello, world' db 13,10,0
The and macros provides a convenient way to align code or data on a word, longword, paragraph or other boundary. (Some assemblers call this directive .) The syntax of the and macros is
align 4 ; align on 4-byte boundary align 16 ; align on 16-byte boundary align 8,db 0 ; pad with 0s rather than NOPs align 4,resb 1 ; align to 4 in the BSS alignb 4 ; equivalent to previous line
Both macros require their first argument to be a power of two; they both compute the number of additional bytes required to bring the length of the current section up to a multiple of that power of two, and then apply the prefix to their second argument to perform the alignment.
If the second argument is not specified, the default for is , and the default for is . So if the second argument is specified, the two macros are equivalent. Normally, you can just use in code and data sections and in BSS sections, and never need the second argument except for special purposes.
and , being simple macros, perform no error checking: they cannot warn you if their first argument fails to be a power of two, or if their second argument generates more than one byte of code. In each of these cases they will silently do the wrong thing.
(or with a second argument of ) can be used within structure definitions:
struc mytype2 mt_byte: resb 1 alignb 2 mt_word: resw 1 alignb 4 mt_long: resd 1 mt_str: resb 32 endstruc
This will ensure that the structure members are sensibly aligned relative to the base of the structure.
A final caveat: and work relative to the beginning of the section, not the beginning of the address space in the final executable. Aligning to a 16-byte boundary when the section you're in is only guaranteed to be aligned to a 4-byte boundary, for example, is a waste of effort. Again, NASM does not check that the section's alignment characteristics are sensible for the use of or .
The directive is used to simplify the handling of parameters passed on the stack. Stack based parameter passing is used by many high level languages, including C, C++ and Pascal.
While NASM comes with macros which attempt to duplicate this functionality (see section 7.4.5), the syntax is not particularly convenient to use and is not TASM compatible. Here is an example which shows the use of without any external macros:
some_function: %push mycontext ; save the current context %stacksize large ; tell NASM to use bp %arg i:word, j_ptr:word mov ax,[i] mov bx,[j_ptr] add ax,[bx] ret %pop ; restore original context
This is similar to the procedure defined in section 7.4.5 and adds the value in i to the value pointed to by j_ptr and returns the sum in the ax register. See section 4.7.1 for an explanation of and and the use of context stacks.
The directive is used in conjunction with the (see section 4.9.1) and the (see section 4.9.3) directives. It tells NASM the default size to use for subsequent and directives. The directive takes one required argument which is one of , or .
%stacksize flat
This form causes NASM to use stack-based parameter addressing relative to and it assumes that a near form of call was used to get to this label (i.e. that is on the stack).
%stacksize large
This form uses to do stack-based parameter addressing and assumes that a far form of call was used to get to this address (i.e. that and are on the stack).
%stacksize small
This form also uses to address stack parameters, but it is different from because it also assumes that the old value of bp is pushed onto the stack (i.e. it expects an instruction). In other words, it expects that , and are on the top of the stack, underneath any local space which may have been allocated by . This form is probably most useful when used in combination with the directive (see section 4.9.3).
The directive is used to simplify the use of local temporary stack variables allocated in a stack frame. Automatic local variables in C are an example of this kind of variable. The directive is most useful when used with the (see section 4.9.2 and is also compatible with the directive (see section 4.9.1). It allows simplified reference to variables on the stack which have been allocated typically by using the instruction (see section B.4.65 for a description of that instruction). An example of its use is the following:
silly_swap: %push mycontext ; save the current context %stacksize small ; tell NASM to use bp %assign %$localsize 0 ; see text for explanation %local old_ax:word, old_dx:word enter %$localsize,0 ; see text for explanation mov [old_ax],ax ; swap ax & bx mov [old_dx],dx ; and swap dx & cx mov ax,bx mov dx,cx mov bx,[old_ax] mov cx,[old_dx] leave ; restore old bp ret ; %pop ; restore original context
The variable is used internally by the directive and must be defined within the current context before the directive may be used. Failure to do so will result in one expression syntax error for each variable declared. It then may be used in the construction of an appropriately sized ENTER instruction as shown in the example.
NASM also has preprocessor directives which allow access to information from external sources. Currently they include:
The directive is used to notify NASM that the input line corresponds to a specific line number in another file. Typically this other file would be an original source file, with the current NASM input being the output of a pre-processor. The directive allows NASM to output messages which indicate the line number of the original source file, instead of the file that is being read by NASM.
This preprocessor directive is not generally of use to programmers, by may be of interest to preprocessor authors. The usage of the preprocessor directive is as follows:
%line nnn[+mmm] [filename]
In this directive, indentifies the line of the original source file which this line corresponds to. is an optional parameter which specifies a line increment value; each line of the input file read in is considered to correspond to lines of the original source file. Finally, is an optional parameter which specifies the file name of the original source file.
After reading a preprocessor directive, NASM will report all file name and line numbers relative to the values specified therein.
The directive makes it possible to read the value of an environment variable at assembly time. This could, for example, be used to store the contents of an environment variable into a string, which could be used at some other point in your code.
For example, suppose that you have an environment variable , and you want the contents of to be embedded in your program. You could do that as follows:
%define FOO %!FOO %define quote ' tmpstr db quote FOO quote
At the time of writing, this will generate an "unterminated string" warning at the time of defining "quote", and it will add a space before and after the string that is read in. I was unable to find a simple workaround (although a workaround can be created using a multi-line macro), so I believe that you will need to either learn how to create more complex macros, or allow for the extra spaces if you make use of this feature in that way.